Talk:Main Page
From Libertarian Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Questions
Should this site be referred to as "Libertarian Wiki" or "the Libertarian Wiki"?
Also, should the site be linked to as http://www.libertarianwiki.org/ or http://libertarianwiki.org/ . I prefer the first, but initially found it via the second.
I guess I should go get myself an account here, now. :) 170.35.224.64 09:27, 2 Jul 2004 (PDT)
I slightly prefer "Libertarian Wiki", and http://libertarianwiki.org because they are shorter. Paul Studier 15:24, 2 Jul 2004 (PDT)
I would like to suggest that the text "Attention Link Spammers: All external links now have the attribute rel="nofollow". No external link will be indexed by a search engine. All spam links will be blacklisted." be moved to the bottom of the main page. The people who would enjoy this page have to read three sentences before they even get to the 'meat'. Thane Eichenauer 21:13, 8 November 2005 (PST)
Since I disabled anonymous edits, we have not had any problems with link spam. Therefore I have removed the message altogether. Paul Studier 01:47, 9 November 2005 (PST)
[edit] Feedback
Very intresting wiki site!... Thanx! --HarryRens 11:08, 15 October 2005 (PDT)
[edit] LibertarianWiki symbol?
What is that symbol supposed to be? Is that peace sign? If so, I think it's inappropriate. For a libertarian, there is nothing intrinsically good about peace. It's liberty that they value and will wage war of rebellion against their oppressors, if necessary, to obtain it. Peace in itself is worthless if it's at the cost of being under a tyrannical system. Liberty is more fundamental than peace. They are called LIBERtarians afterall, not Peacetarians. Those whose fundamental value is peace would accept tyranny if it brought peace. Those whose fundamental value is liberty won't sacrifice it for peace. The Statue of Liberty or the Ama-gi symbol would be much more appropriate. RJII 12:35, 27 June 2006 (PDT)
It's supposed to be the Libertarian emoticon. --DavidCary 12:09, 16 July 2007 (PDT)
[edit] Inline citations?
How about updating the software so we can do inline citations? Like, <ref>Heider, Ulrike. Anarchism: Left, Right and Green, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1994. p. 3</ref> LoneWolf 11:14, 8 August 2006 (PDT)
You can do it like this: [1]
- ^ Heider, Ulrike. Anarchism: Left, Right and Green, San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1994. p. 3
More info is available at Wikipedia:Help:Editing Paul Studier 13:46, 8 August 2006 (PDT)
The inline citation requires a special plug-in. I will try to install it next time I upgrade the software version. Paul Studier 17:38, 9 August 2006 (PDT)
